PDP for Constellation

WHAT DO I WANT TO WRITE ABOUT?

For my dissertation I want to look at horror films. They have always been my favourite kind of movie, and being in Cath’s lectures I could really see the link between the theories she was talking about, and some of the films I’d seen. What particularly interested me was the idea of how there seem to be a limited variation in the type of women in visual culture; The Mother, The Seductress, The Virgin. The type I want to focus on is The Mother, in particular the Bad Mother.

I think this will be good for my subject practice, because it makes you think deeper about some of the meanings behind seemingly trivial things. And also what devices can be used to create atmosphere and SHOW who is “Bad”.

Some of the theories that Cath talked about in her lectures (especially those on the grotesque) I can use in my dissertation. Such as the Phallic Woman, the maternal imagination and liminality.

I will definitely be looking at a lot of the writings she gave us in the lectures, such as Kristeva and Creed, as I found what they had to say really interesting. I found Cath focused on the materiality of monsters, whereas I want to take a more feminist slant, and look specifically at the maternal aspect of those monsters

I wrote my essay in term 1 about distorted motherhood in American Horror Story, and really enjoyed it. I found I had maybe too much to write about though! Maybe in my dissertation I will use chapters to focus my ideas more, to look at the specific aspects of the maternal, instead of jumping around all the time. This will also stop me from getting off track and talking about unrelated things, which I found I was often doing during my first essay.

EXAMPLES I MIGHT USE 

There are loads of films that use the grotesque maternal. After doing some reading, I’ve realised a lot of films have some quite subtle hints to the maternal, but after looking out for them, you see them all the time (mostly I’m thinking about the Alien films). But this also makes me worry that I’m looking out for it too much! Like people who read too much into conspiracy theories and only see what they want to see. I’m going to try really hard in my essay to take that into account and see it from multiple viewpoints. I think that maybe in some of the books I’ve read, especially Creed, she does often see what she wants to see, and crowbars feminism in where maybe it’s not necessary.

But having said this, I think I want to look at “The Haunted House” as a metaphorical womb. I said this to my boyfriend and he scoffed a bit, and I can see his point. But there have been a few books that talk about it like Creed’s The Monstrous Feminine and this blog, which also talks about it in relation to The Shining;

http://thefilmemporium.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/critcal-analysis-shining-1980.html

I’m going to look specifically at the Shining in the chapter that I look at Haunted Houses and other metaphorical wombs (like the cliched cellar). I want to perhaps also look at “As Above so Below” because that represents Hell as a myriad of underground tunnels and caves, some of which are full of blood. As Creed points out “blood is one of the most common images of horror associated with the house”. Is this because they are a metaphorical womb?

HOW TO GO ABOUT RESEARCH

I think the best plan for doing my research is to read a few books that look at the kind of thing I want to read about such as Creed’s “The Monstrous Feminine” and Arnold’s “Maternal Horror Film – Melodrama and Motherhood”, and then decide on my chapters, based on what I found most interesting in those books. Then, using those chapter ideas, read more specific books and articles, noting down quotes that could be used to back up my arguments. Then use Cath’s columns method to work out what theories this quote backs up and what the meanings are within the quote.

My Chapters are going to be

  • Symbolic Wombs
  • Amoral Mothers and Classic Villains
  • Uncanny Childbirth and link between bad mothers and bad children
  • Men becoming the monstrous maternal

When I talked to Cath about this, she suggested that it might not be necessary for Men as Maternal to have it’s own chapter and maybe it should be combined with another. I can see where she’s coming from and I think it would go well in the second chapter. But I’m going to see how much I have to say about it before I decide whether it needs it’s own chapter.

I am considering changing the order of the chapters to make it more cohesive. I do think that the childbirth and children should be at the end, because that is the last stage of maternity I guess!


Understanding Colour- How Colours Interact

We were told today to create sheets of paper painted with the colours we’d made in the previous sessions, along with a few black, and mid-greys. We didn’t know what these were for until we started talking about the books “Interaction of Colour” by Josef Albers and “The Elements of Colour”  by Johannes Itten. They’re about how colour is perceived differently when it is placed next to different colours.

colours1

So we went back and made out own colour combinations. I don’t think mine worked quite as well, but in photos I think they work a lot better for some reason?

DSC_0207

We also looked at how when you place a colour in front of grey, you can see a kind of halo of the complimentary around it. I had serious trouble seeing it! But everyone else seemed to be able to see it so.

As interesting as this session was, I’m not sure how I’d apply it to my subject work.


Understanding Colour 1

I chose to do Understanding Colour for my field option because I’ve noticed that my work is very brown and grey. I do sometimes add colour to my work but I’m not sure it’s always successful. I also enjoyed Tom’s workshop at the beginning of the year about form and colour and wanted to look more into it. Our first lecture was fairly interesting, but I had already looked at a lot we had talked about while in my Foundation course.

colour title

”In 1676 Sire Isaac Newton, using a triangular prism, analysed white sunlight into a spectrum of colours”- The Elements of Colour by Johannes Itten,

7710-004-0F0F0E67

According to him there were 7 types of colour contrast;

  • Contrast of hue (black/white, red/yellow/blue)
  • Light/ Dark contrast
  • Cold/ Warm contrast    (More distant objects appear colder in colour)
  • Complimentary contrast
  • Simultaneous contrast
  • Contrast of saturation
  • Contrast of extension    (Proportions of complimentary pairs are

Yellow : Violet = 3 : 1

Orange : Blue = 2 : 1

Red : Green = 1 : 1

There is also a chapter on what I find most interesting; the relation of colour to form. We all related colours to shapes. Is this because of outward stimuli (e.g. seeing road sings) or because we there is something inherent about the shapes.

Red – Square…. Weight and opacity of red agree with the static, aggressive shape of the square

Yellow – Triangle …. Symbol of thought matched with lucid yellow

Blue – Circle…. Relaxation and smooth motion. Symbol of spirit.

+  +  +

In the afternoon we looked at how there are three primary colours; red, yellow and blue. And three secondary colours; green, purple and orange. But then there are several different types of the primaries, especially when you’re painting. These paints are not “pure” primaries, but rather slightly mixed with other secondaries.

DSC_0196

This means you have to think about which paints you use when you want to mix them. If you were to use a purpley blue with a orangey yellow you would end up with a muddy green because there would be too much red in the paints. Because red is the opposite to green it would make the green turn brown.

To illustrate this we mixed all the coloured paints together, both shades of each primary with each other. So in total there were 15 combinations. The gradients would help us later with matching colours.

DSC_0197




Monstrosity and Gender Debates

In this lecture we looked at challenging patriarchal ideology or the “law of the father”. What is so ingrained that we don’t notice what’s normal? We looked in particular at the Vagina Dentata and castration fear again, and the myths concerning women as the castrator.

Again, we summarised one of creed’s chapters;

  • Women as the devil’s gateway
  • Symbolic castration (loss of mother’s identity)
  • The vampire is actually a vagina dentata
  • Dreams about teeth falling out = castration fears. But who is the castrator?
  • Rather than consider man’s dread of the imaginary castrating woman, Freud takes refuge in the theory of woman’s castration
  • Penis envy? Maybe not!
  • Vagina as a trap or black hole/ dangerous entrances
  • Popular derogatory terms “Man eater”, “Viper”

Although I think a lot of these theories are quite strange, I can relate them to horror films I’ve seen and it’s interesting to look at them from a different perspective.

With thinking about my 500 word essay I think the options are things to do with “Aesthetic Principles”, “Deconstruction”, and “Gender and Beauty”. This is what the lectures have been about, and I’ve found a lot of it very interesting, particularly the latest lectures on the grotesque.


Grotesque in Visual Culture

In this lecture we started looking at the grotesque. There is an emphasis on the materiality of the body, focusing on textures like flesh and blood, and liminality. When designing the grotesque, the outer and inner are not separate; there is an element of “seepage”.

We’ve looked at what makes an “Abject Body”. It is one that reminds us our body in unruly, or doesn’t respect borders. Anything that crosses or threatens to cross the border is abject. Anything that loses it’s form is abject.

Cath told us to read Creed’s 1993 chapter on “Kristeva, Femininity, Abject” and summarise it. I think this is a good way to read chapters because you then know what chapter to go back to more easily. Here are the notes I made on it;

  • Horror films in relation to the maternal figure.
  • The “border”, the mother and child relationship, the feminine body.
  • The abject is what threatens meaning and life (The Self)
  • Food loathing as part of hatred of bodily functions – cannibalism as ultimate abjection.
  • Corpse- body without soul, so the opposite of spiritual: the vampire, ghoul, zombie
  • Abjection is always ambiguous
  • Bodily waste in horror films – notion of the border
  • Monsters are produced at the border: were creatures, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
  • Improper gender roles create abject (Psycho)
  • Maternal Female body is key to horror films (inside coming outside)
  • Menstruation is abject (Carrie)
  • Mothers refusing to release children.
  • Absence of father: Repression
  • Pleasure in perversion. Takes you back to a time when Mother-Child relationship was about “play” with waste and filth. (Not sure about this one!!!)
  • Significantly the possesses girl is about the menstruate.
  • In carrie, blood and Pleasure are linked.
  • Maternal is shameless/ Paternal is shameful.

One of the things I found really interesting in this chapter is the idea of the maternal. I think I want to look more into it. And read the rest of the book.